(July 8, 2013 at 8:51 am)viocjit Wrote:(July 7, 2013 at 4:28 pm)whateverist Wrote: Absolutely correct. The male body is essentially a testosterone infused female body. I'm not sure if it makes any sense to ask how a human body infused with neither estrogen nor testosterone would develop or what it would eventually look like.
I'm OK to say that this is correct.
Some articles from Wikipedia :
1.Chromosome
2.X chromosome
3.Y chromosome
I'm curious how you would square this knowledge of the SRY gene, that effectively masculinizes the developing fetus, with the assertion of Genesis 2:23
Quote:Gen 2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
It seems men are taken out of women, not the other way around but you may have a different interpretation of that verse.
Also, just wanted to bring your attention to my reply on "agnostic Christian" to see if I understand you correctly.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
