If you believe in the God of the Bible, why try to prove it logically?

[Esquilax]

I've explained that reasoning to you before Esq. I have good reason. There cannot be proof. So your question makes no sense. I'm sorry if I seem short with you. I'm sick to the back teeth of reiterating that point.

The problem, of course, is that you can't have a good reason without evidence by definition, because it means you cannot demonstrate the truth of your proposition, even to yourself. You can believe it all you want, but if you can't show it, you don't know it.

So, essentially, you're taking a claim to be true despite having no way of knowing that. Besides, why are you privileging this one claim lacking in proof over any other? Why don't you believe in all gods, since there's the same amount of evidence for all of them?