Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 17, 2025, 9:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Problems with the theory of evolution.
#4
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution.
(July 11, 2013 at 3:07 am)jamie_russels Wrote: Hi. I'm new here so this will be my first post. I'm Jamie from Alabama. I'm a proud Baptist and I'd like to point out a few inconsistencies I found in the theory of evolution.

Okay, so first of all, welcome on board. Second, and I don't mean to be insulting, but are you for real? We in the online atheist community are pretty used to being trolled, is that what you're doing?

(I guess I'm kind of covering my ass here, because I don't wanna be seen as getting drawn in if it turns out you are fake. Tongue )

Assuming you're not- and I will, because I like talking and this seems kind of fun anyway, and I like thinking the best of people- let's continue:

Quote:The first point I'd like to make is in relation to the age of the earth and how it ties in with "evolution".

Well, here's your first mistake: it doesn't. Evolution is a theory that solely deals with existing life, and it makes no claim as to anything that happened before life existed, nor the creation of the universe, nor even the creation of life. Just what happens to life over time. Creationists like to conflate evolution with things like abiogenesis and the beginnings of the universe in order to make the theory seem ridiculous and overreaching, but when they do so, they're simply incorrect.

Quote:I'm a young earth creationist. I believe that God created the earth approximately 5,000-6,000 years ago, and there is a good reason for this belief. Atheist scientists will tell us that the earth is approximately 4.6 billion years old, but this is impossible. Please hear me out and let me explain before you scoff and abandon this thread.

Having read through your entire post, you never once tell us what your good reason for believing in a young earth is, nor do you explain why you feel an old earth is impossible. Not to bog down the thread from its intended purpose, but would you mind doing so? Big claims made without evidence give me hives. Tongue

Quote:Atheist scientists believe that we evolved from stardust (even just saying it in a sentence sounds silly lol)

It sounds silly because it is silly, and no atheist, nor scientist, would say such a thing. In fact, I'd challenge you to find one who has.

Quote:
Quote:During a supernova, when a massive star explodes at the end of its life, the resulting high energy environment enables the creation of some of the heaviest elements including iron and nickel. The explosion also disperses the different elements across the universe, scattering the stardust which now makes up planets including Earth. Any element heavier than hydrogen is ultimately a product of the nuclear fusion that takes place within stars.

So apparently we are living beings that evolved from lifeless materials.

What you're talking about now isn't evolution, but a distinct theory called abiogenesis, at least in terms of the beginnings of life. The creation of elements is yet another distinct field of study, one that I won't even pretend to know anything about, but you've crossed over several ballparks from your original discussion of evolution.

Quote:It doesn't make much sense to me because last weekend I was sitting by a lake pondering God's marvelous creation when I picked up a rock and stared at it. It suddenly dawned on me that if that very rock was 4.6 billion years old like athiest scientists say it is, then rocks would have evolved into intelligent creatures also.

Rocks aren't alive at all, and since evolution is a process that only occurs within living things that can breed, of course it wouldn't have happened with rocks. Even if you were talking about abiogenesis, at no point can one boil down that process to "matter+time=life"

Quote: If evolution really was true and we all evolved from lifeless materials over 4.6 billion years, then that rock should also be a mammal or an insect or something by now. But there it was, still a useless rock, just sitting there. No brain, no self-awareness. Nothing.

Incidentally, since we're talking about this, can you provide a single scientific source that states that evolution does this? Also, why would you think that all matter would "evolve" into life, even so? How would the planet even be sustainable in that case?

Quote:This is another point I'd like to make. In my senior year of science class my teacher (who I also suspect is an atheist) was explaining to us that humans developed large complex brains because "we integrated meat into our diets a long time ago".

Quote:The modern human brain is two to three times larger than that of our closest relatives, chimpanzees. But to supply energy to such metabolically demanding tissue, a distinct trade-off in energy allocation had to evolve. Meat and other protein-rich foods were evolutionary drivers of bigger, more complex human brains.

I suspect the explanation was a little more detailed than that. Be honest: were you paying attention? Tongue

Incidentally, the quote you provided mentions that our brains were larger in comparison to other primate species, because we are carnivores, not all species in general.

Quote:Sounds silly to me. We started eating meat and the protein made us evolve a larger more complex brain, resulting in superior intelligence? Okay... well we aren't the only species that eats meat lol.

See above.

Quote:Why didn't other animals evolve to be as intelligent as us? I can name dozens and dozens of animals that eat meat, but can you name how many lions you've met that attended university and became doctors? When you went to high school did you have a grizzly bear teacher? Have you ever had your taxes done by a dog accountant? Nope, not me anyways. A human did my taxes this year.

Given that you were wrong on the initial premise that led to this, I don't feel much reason to debunk it further, but I will say this: strawmen aren't cool. These canards get trotted out a lot, mostly by people who don't understand how evolution works, and... it's tiresome.

Quote:Also, I did some research on something else. Apparently the total amount of water on earth is "1.386x10^21 liters", whatever that means. I don't know what the X and the ^ is for, but I'll continue anyways. There are almost 7 billion people on earth, so let's assume that human beings drink two liters of water a day, which could be true for some people. Some people drink a lot of water. That would mean that every human being on this planet collectively drinks 12x10^9 liters of water a day (I'm pretty sure that's right, I had to ask some Asian guy I know to do the math for me. I kinda suck at math)

So, besides not being about evolution at all (or even about anything at all: what are you trying to prove here? That there's more water on earth than estimated? So what?) you do understand that water doesn't disappear when you drink it, right? You... expel it back out into the world, through urine and sweat and spit and all that. It doesn't just all drain away into you, never to be seen again.

Also, since water is a molecule made of hydrogen and oxygen atoms, it's a fairly easy thing to make from its component parts. Just saying.

Quote:Now here's what I'm getting at... atheist scientists say that life evolved around 3 billion years ago, so this would mean that human beings alone (excluding animals) would have consumed 9.5 times the amount of water on this planet. This is obviously impossible, because if this were true our oceans would be completely drained by now. So how do we still have large amounts of unused water?

It's all reused water. Seriously. The molecules go through many forms, sustain life periodically, but it never just disappears. It just changes form temporarily.

Quote:One more quick thing. If there is no oxygen in space, then how does the sun keep burning? We all know that fire needs oxygen to keep burning.

Being a bit literal there. The sun isn't literally a ball of fire, it's a thermonuclear chain reaction caused by gravity. That's an oversimplification, but it's a start.

Now, I hope you're not a troll. I've operated under the assumption that you aren't, and done my best to clear some stuff up. My girlfriend Luckie thinks you're legit, so hey. The problem seems to be that you don't really understand evolution, if you are real. This can be fixed. Just click the links.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Rahul - July 11, 2013 at 1:02 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Esquilax - July 11, 2013 at 3:49 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Mudhammam - January 9, 2014 at 8:04 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by pocaracas - January 11, 2014 at 8:42 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Esquilax - January 12, 2014 at 2:05 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by LostLocke - July 11, 2013 at 12:36 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Tonus - July 11, 2013 at 2:25 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Nine - July 11, 2013 at 8:09 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Aractus - July 11, 2013 at 9:05 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Rahul - July 11, 2013 at 9:06 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by genkaus - July 11, 2013 at 9:14 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by genkaus - July 11, 2013 at 10:37 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Kayenneh - July 11, 2013 at 10:41 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Jackalope - July 11, 2013 at 10:42 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Kayenneh - July 11, 2013 at 10:52 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Jackalope - July 11, 2013 at 10:57 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Cyberman - July 11, 2013 at 11:01 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Jackalope - July 11, 2013 at 11:06 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Cyberman - July 11, 2013 at 11:12 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Kayenneh - July 11, 2013 at 12:10 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Esquilax - July 11, 2013 at 12:22 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Kayenneh - July 11, 2013 at 12:43 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Kayenneh - July 11, 2013 at 12:48 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Kayenneh - July 11, 2013 at 12:49 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by LostLocke - July 11, 2013 at 12:55 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Kayenneh - July 11, 2013 at 12:54 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Mystical - July 11, 2013 at 12:58 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Rahul - July 11, 2013 at 1:12 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Rahul - July 11, 2013 at 1:16 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Rahul - July 11, 2013 at 1:43 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Tonus - July 11, 2013 at 3:18 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Rahul - July 11, 2013 at 6:45 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Aractus - July 12, 2013 at 5:03 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Chas - July 12, 2013 at 10:10 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by LastPoet - July 12, 2013 at 10:21 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Kayenneh - January 8, 2014 at 1:58 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by EgoRaptor - January 9, 2014 at 9:50 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Kayenneh - January 9, 2014 at 10:14 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Whateverist - January 9, 2014 at 10:58 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Minimalist - January 12, 2014 at 2:28 am
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Kayenneh - January 9, 2014 at 8:16 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Whateverist - January 10, 2014 at 9:10 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by KichigaiNeko - January 10, 2014 at 9:15 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Mudhammam - January 11, 2014 at 8:23 pm
RE: Problems with the theory of evolution. - by Angrboda - January 12, 2014 at 1:35 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Theory to how "Moses Crossing the Sea" tale came from Woah0 0 901 August 14, 2022 at 7:49 am
Last Post: Woah0
  sim theory Drich 69 11714 May 28, 2020 at 10:07 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Lightbulb Just a theory kbultra 60 12036 July 23, 2018 at 4:52 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  The theory of evolution HOAX pabsta 439 125553 October 23, 2017 at 1:49 pm
Last Post: JackRussell
  A theory about Creationism leaders Lucanus 24 8642 October 17, 2017 at 8:51 pm
Last Post: brewer
  My final theory of Creation as a believer Old Baby 20 5453 January 7, 2016 at 8:53 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Video Problems With The Bible Pt 9 - Sampson Mental Outlaw 17 5241 September 8, 2015 at 4:52 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Problems With The Bible Pt 5 - Sodom and Gomorrah Mental Outlaw 61 19381 May 3, 2015 at 4:30 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  The theory of god! I don't think so. ignoramus 9 3708 August 5, 2014 at 9:03 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  The Jesus Moot Theory DeistPaladin 16 5580 February 11, 2014 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: CapnAwesome



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)