RE: If you believe in the God of the Bible, why try to prove it logically?
July 14, 2013 at 5:40 am
(July 14, 2013 at 5:33 am)Esquilax Wrote:(July 14, 2013 at 5:28 am)fr0d0 Wrote: I disagree because I know the biblical stance. If you have a point you should present it. But I fear you know the strength of you point relies wholly upon gross misinterpretation. If that is so, then I happily reject your point.
So when the bible explicitly calls for the death of gays and witches, those were just accidental verses, huh? Do you actually have an argument here, or are you just going to resort to the same dishonest chicanery I've seen from godschild and ronedee in recent days, and just say that I don't understand the bible because I disagree with your interpretation of it?
Because, you know, unless you can actually provide evidence that yours is the correct one, what reason do any of us have to take you remotely seriously, in your quest to turn all the worst parts of your religion into happy-go-lucky fucking adventures?
Lack of evidence has never stopped Frods, in fact apparently just asking for such is "illogical"
You just have to accept what he says as true.
I wonder though what his reaction would be if he was on trial for a crime and the prosecuting attorney told the jury not to worry about the evidence and just accept the prosecutions claim that Frodo was guilty.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.