The Problem of Imperfect Revelation: Your Thoughts?

[genkaus]

Oh, I did miss that. But wouldn't it make more sense to say "How X acts is dependent on X's nature", not the other way around? Unless you're, say, referring our epistemic situation with regards to inferring X's nature from its actions?

I may be missing the point here, but more sense in regard to what?

Ah, good point. But didn't you earlier state that you were surprised Christians/Muslims didn't take that position, since "it'd leave their opponent without a refutation"?

Exactly. Once you state that the thing you are referring to is not subject to logic, how can there be a logical refutation?