|
Questions on the Kalam Cosmological argument
|
Usually Craig starts by illustrating why actual infinites are logically "absurd", and from there he draws the conclusion that the universe is finite and must have a beginning. He then asserts that this requires a timeless non-physical all powerful creator, since this is required to create a physical universe out of absolutely "nothing".
How would you respond to this claim? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| The Kalam Cosmological Argument | Disagreeable | 123 | 7673 |
December 15, 2024 at 6:11 pm Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4 |
|
| The Cosmological Proof | LinuxGal | 53 | 6211 |
September 24, 2023 at 12:24 pm Last Post: LinuxGal |
|
| Kalam | LinuxGal | 75 | 8939 |
December 6, 2022 at 9:17 pm Last Post: LinuxGal |
|
| The cosmological argument really needs to die already. | Freedom of thought | 16 | 5008 |
December 13, 2013 at 10:07 am Last Post: Esquilax |
|
| Leibnizian Cosmological Argument | MindForgedManacle | 7 | 2878 |
September 18, 2013 at 11:47 pm Last Post: MindForgedManacle |
|
| Something that can strengthen the cosmological argument? | Mystic | 1 | 1656 |
April 8, 2013 at 6:23 am Last Post: A_Nony_Mouse |
|
| Simple existence - Cosmological argument leading to God | Mystic | 5 | 4011 |
June 14, 2012 at 4:26 am Last Post: genkaus |
|
