(July 25, 2013 at 5:35 pm)Slave Wrote: teaearlgreyhot: You said;But can they be said to posses self awareness? A mechanistic explanation can suffice for those attributes of plants you mentioned.
Quote:All beings with a right to life are capable of desiring continued existence.
All beings capable of desiring continued existence have a concept of themselves as a continuing subject of experiences.
No plant has a concept of itself as a continuing subject of experiences.
Therefore, No plant has a right to life.
While you present an interesting line of reasoning, it is not without fault. The sentience argument falters with plants, as they - contrary to popular belief- do display sentience in their own way. Plants respond to stimuli, search for food, reproduce, defend themselves from predators. There are a multitude of studies that confirm vegetative intelligence. Here is one, for example:
http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/content/92/1/1
The sentience argument is not consistent.
My ignore list
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).