Abusive Theology 101

[Esquilax]

Originally, you gave food and comfort to the homeless man. Now you are bragging about it. You have received your reward. But unlike Christ, who gave his life freely, you demanded that he violate his faith for your further generosity. In your "parable" you play the part of God. That's what makes it so contemptible. Get a clue, YOU are not God.

So what's the difference? Seriously, I've never understood this: what is it about god that gives him so many passes on the social mores you expect others to follow? It can't be that he's a source of morality and righteousness, because if that were the case he'd obviously never stoop so low as to commit an act you'd find unacceptable if a lowly human did it.

Is it just might makes right?