RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
August 4, 2013 at 12:02 am
(This post was last modified: August 4, 2013 at 12:10 am by Alter2Ego.)
(July 11, 2013 at 3:48 pm)Michael Schubert Wrote: Religion and Science are also not two opposing view points. Creationists say you can only either reject God and accept evolution, or you accept God and reject evolution, which is objectively false. Charles Darwin was never even an Atheist; his religious views fluctuated throughout his lifetime. In fact, On the Origin of Species reflects theological views, and only rejects God's omnipotence. Watch that video I posted earlier about the Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism. It's very informative. This one is excellent, too.ALTER2EGO -to- MICHAEL SCHUBERT:
It depends which religion you are referring to. FYI: There is such a thing as true religion and false religion.
(July 11, 2013 at 3:48 pm)Michael Schubert Wrote: Charles Darwin was never even an Atheist; his religious views fluctuated throughout his lifetime. In fact, On the Origin of Species reflects theological views, and only rejects God's omnipotence. Watch that video I posted earlier about the Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism. It's very informative. This one is excellent, too.As for your views on Charles Darwin's philosophy, during which he flip-flopped between atheism and paganism, I have him pegged as atheist for several reasons. One important reason is that he attempted to kick Jehovah to the curb by pushing abiogenesis theory (the believe that life can come from non-life by itself). Even after abiogenesis theory was debunked by Louis Pasteur in 1859, Charles Darwin persisted in speculating abiogenesis theory.