RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
August 4, 2013 at 2:04 am
(This post was last modified: August 4, 2013 at 2:35 am by Alter2Ego.)
(July 11, 2013 at 8:51 am)popeyespappy Wrote:ALTER2EGO -to- POPEYESPAPPY:(July 11, 2013 at 3:05 am)Esquilax Wrote: So, when scientists used evolutionary theory to predict exactly which stratographic layer they'd need to dig in to find a transitional form between fish and tetrapods, and then literally found one there, it was just an accident? Hmm?
I talked about tetrapod evolution in the fossil record a couple of pages back in response to A2E's repeated lie about no transitional fossils. Of course the ignorant cunt ignored my post as I'm sure she will ignore yours. Shubin's book Your Inner Fish refutes every lie she has told in the first few chapters.
PopeyesPappy to Alter2Ego. You are a lying bitch and an intentionally ignorant fucking cunt aren't you? Please do the world a favor and go play in traffic. Preferably before you breed. The world needs your genetic line to go extinct.
I distinctly recall reading forum rules that says: "No personal attacks."
Quote:3. No Personal Attacks
As a discussion based forum, the ability to interact civilly is very important. Attacks made in jest (with the understanding of both/all parties - tacit or otherwise) are allowed, as are off-handed comments that do not escalate into flame wars. Staff will take the context of each insult into consideration before taking action. Provoked insults (as determined by staff) will not incur a warning, but they are not encouraged. In the case of unprovoked insults, staff will attempt to ascertain if an attack was in jest, and will discuss the attack with both parties where possible and then decide what action to take. Members are encouraged to use the "report post" button if they believe a post violates this rule. This rule does not cover attacking someone's argument. It's perfectly reasonable to say, "That argument is stupid", but it is recommended to back it up with sound reasoning.
http://atheistforums.org/rules.php
You are on permanent Ignore. You will remain on "Ignore" until my account at this website is cancelled or until I leave voluntarily.
After what you told to me at Post 151, do you seriously think I want anything further to do with you? I cannot even read the tripe you post anymore, much less respond to it, because you are now on my "Ignore" list. Whenever anyone quotes you so that your posts become visible to me, I will simply scroll past without reading.
Now, how does that grab you?
FYI: I do not deal with people who are convinced that foul language is proof of high intellect. We are all adults. Act your age. Learn to disagree without resorting to out-of-control, juvenile behavior, such you used at Post 151. I am as convinced that you are wrong in your philosophy, as you and other atheists are convinced I am wrong. We will probably never agree. But that is no reason for using demeaning language towards those that have an opposing viewpoint. People with opposing viewpoints can have intelligent discussions, while disagreeing with one another. There is nothing wrong with discussing and disagreeing at the same time. The problem comes in when certain ones think they must destroy their opponents.
Now, go ahead and curse some more. I guarantee that I will not be reading it ever again.