Proof of Christianity

[NoraBrimstone]

BWS if you looked into it only briefly you'd see it all explained. Matthew lays down the royal lineage passed through the male line. Luke lays down the female blood line. The two together prove the lineage of title and blood.

No. Check your Bible.

They can't be the same, because one fooled females and the other males. Look at the link I provided, it's all explained.

Again, check your Bible.

It's called the line of Jesus through Joseph because that's just the way these things are referred to. Why is Mary's line in Luke full of females and Matthews names male?

Of course if you want to hold on to your comedic line be my guest. You can't say that you don't also know the actual answer.

I shouldn't need to respond to this part, because by now you should have checked your Bible. But I know you have some sort of pathological fear of your own holy book, so won't have done so. Hell, you can just go back a few pages and see the line in Luke that I posted. Anyway, the point is, it isn't full of females.

In any case, it says the line of Joseph in both books so you're still incorrect.

I'm incorrect how?

I never say it didn't say Joseph. I said that the text supports Jesus lineage and right to qualify as messiah, as Nora denied. One is the line of Joseph, the other Mary. That much is Crystal clear.

What? It's crystal clear that where the Bible (which you haven't even read) quite clearly says "Joseph" it means "Mary"? Are you insane?