(August 12, 2013 at 9:47 pm)Drich Wrote: So.. We are different in that you are willing to do and believe as everyone else's does and believes, and has no issues hinging critical life desisions on how things appear to work. I couldnt help but notice in your best repaint of my analogy you never checked the structural integrity of the 'lift.' No, you were quite content in placing your life in what the group actually thought of the situation rather than seeking the truth. Heck, in your repaint, you could have fabricated a 'lift' repairman to check it out for you, but no. Your 'proof' begins and ends on what others think or rather what others tell you to think of a given situation, and what a situation may look like on the surface.
What a funny analogy indeed.
..and your right, you and I do things quite differently.
Nope. We are so different that you didn't even realise that anything I did after finding out that this guy believed the elevator is broken because he read it in a 1000 year old book is completely unnecessary.
Observing the lift and speaking to other people is simply to put my own mind at ease. It gives this guys theory way more credence than it is worth - calling out an engineer would be overkill.
Calling security to remove him would be a more viable option.
Quote:Why do you assume God is the one who broke the elevator?
Didn't god make everything? So he made the lift and also the reason why it is broken. He is also omnipotent so could have easily stopped the lift from breaking.
Remember: you cannot of a creation without a creator.
Any spelling mistakes are due to my godlessness!