(August 19, 2013 at 12:40 am)Ryantology Wrote:Drich Wrote:In your analogy the 'polar bear's environment' has changed thus requiring adaptation in order for the species to continue. In the case of the "elite controller" the enviorment does not change. yet the virus mutates into a weaker form allowing the body to recover from it. If this happens over and over, that strain will go the way of the dodo, or so says your prophet Darwin.
But, this strain seems to be doing just fine as cases of it have been so numerous 'science' could no longer ignore it, and had to not only document it but come up with some cock and bull story as to why thee cases keep coming up. (Other than answered prayer.)
Congratulations, you've figured out how random mutation works, and why sometimes random mutations persist even though they are disadvantageous. Keep up the good work and one day, you can drop the bronze age nonsense and go from the 21st century BCE to the 21st century CE.
which again only furthers my orginal point.
People 'healed' are considered fakers in this day and age or their 'afflictation' was somehow not as 'real' as those who have died of it.
So, someone quick ask me again why doesn't God heal people anymore? The answer: He does, it just those He heals are deemed to have never been 'truly sick' to begin with. to be 'truly sick' one must have been killed by the illness or go through many years of suffering and pain at the hands of doctors and their well established and documented practices. anyone who skirts death or tremendous suffering via God/Prayer is a 'faker' or has some.. what was the term? Ran-Dom Moo-tate-ion was it?
Hmm sounds like 'science' has a catch all term that describes the unknown. So rather than give God his due or even say "we don't know." There is a catch all term that covers all current unknowns..
Where have I heard this before??

Could it have been in the darkages, when the church ascribed everything to God blindly, and made it a blaspheme to question it? Or even now when a brother simply says God works in mysterious ways?
How does this differ from your catch all? Why is your catch all term permitted, and ours is deemed a social blaspheme?
I have an answer and it rhymes with Pip-o-crit.