Something to tell a creationist.

[Samson]

1. Timothy is about being in slavery and how to treat your unbelieving masters. That is not a condoning of slavery, jsut an acceptance that it was the then state of things.

1 Timothy 6
1(A)All who are under the yoke as slaves are to regard their own masters as worthy of all honor so (B)that the name of God and our doctrine will not be spoken against.

2Those who have believers as their masters must not be disrespectful to them because they are ©brethren, but must serve them all the more, because those who partake of the benefit are believers and beloved (D)Teach and preach these principles.

3If anyone (E)advocates a different doctrine and does not agree with (F)sound words, those of our Lord Jesus Christ, and with the doctrine (G)conforming to godliness,

You can still be in "Gods" good grace, just so as long as you are a believer regardless that you own and can whip/beat your slaves..(Of course just so long as you do not kill them).. I'm sorry, but they had the means even back then to view slavery as an immoral act.
Yes, slavery in some societies were a bit different from what we had a couple of centuries ago in the U.S., but it was still considered slavery in terms...And regardless that this was the way things were done back then, I still see no morality in this.

2. In Ephesians perhaps too much focus is being given to "like slaves of christ" (which is a comparison) and states how you should act if you are a slave or a master.

5(E)Slaves, be obedient to those who are your masters according to the flesh, with (F)fear and trembling, in the sincerity of your heart, (G)as to Christ;

Treat your masters as you would Christ...

I agree that Jesus never preached against slavery. I think slavery has a heavy connotation in america of physical subjugation and enslavement. While he does use parables, examples and similarities with (then) current themes. Slavery, I'm sure was seen in an entirely different light then than today.

Not all regarded slavery as a "Good Thing" before their time and even after.. I do agree that it was a bit different then in comparison to now, but when the "Bible" is held by so many to be this perfect composition of morality, this needs to be brought up....

I think focusing on slavery in the teachings of Jesus is bickering over a perspective in history we have no reference for. IMO He's not saying be a good slave and master. He's saying if you are a slave/master be a good one because we're all accountable to God. Arguing that Jesus didn't preach against slavery means he condoned it has got to be some kind of fallacy, but I'm not farmiliar with the constructs of those. Help on fallacies any1?

"Jesus" throughout the Bible (NT) preached for and against many things, but Slavery was not one of them, and for that reason, is the reason it's brought up so many times.

3. "But tell that to the 45% plus here in the U.S. and especially the 99% in the South that take Revelation on it's every word" .. I do every chance I get. Luckily I have the chance to teach children about Jesus and God.

Which "Interpretation" do you teach them? Out of 38,000 branches of the Christian Sect, one's "Opinion" holds a lot of weight on Children and ignorance...

Maybe Jesus was a time traveling future man with oooooo technology for all those miracles. We'll never know until those scientists create that time machine.

I L Ron Hubbard wrote that down somewhere while pondering Scientology LOLOL...