(August 27, 2013 at 9:42 am)themonkeyman Wrote: Bang on the nail - @Drich and @GC I pose a challenge for both of you to prove your theory correct.
I felt I blasphemed because I said the 'Holy Spirit was like a Demon' in the context that they shared afew common attributes 'Spritual Beings / Both Control People / One is Good the Other is Evil (antonym)' So I challenge you to agree with me on that statement. If you dont believe it was blasphemy then you will have no problem.
If you think that its unbelief until death then you shouldent have a problem agreeing with the context of my sentance. I am not saying one is Equal to the other just that they both are similar on afew things.
If you cannot agree on that then I cannot follow your God, If you both agree that what I said there was Theologicially correct you may well be in with a Chance to winning me back! Over to you.
Thanks @Pineapple and @Captain Colostomy you folks speak sense
Agree with what? that the Holy spirit is like a demon because He possess people? What if your analogy is wrong?
The Holy Spirit is an intercessor, a link between you and the Father. not someone who makes you puke clam chower instead of pea soup.
Not to mention you still have a huge obstical to over come in my last rebuttal.
No where in the account of Mat or Mark did the Pharisees verbaly mention the Holy Spirit. Their blaspheme according to those two accounts were based on the Hearts that Christ judged to be blasphmous towards the Holy Spirit. The Pharisees did not even know what a 'Holy Spirit' was let alone 'take His name in vein.' (Which btw is what you think blaspheme is.) In this case according to the words and actions of Christ is not the case.
