(August 27, 2013 at 2:02 am)catfish Wrote:(August 26, 2013 at 2:50 pm)bladevalant546 Wrote: So let us examine this judgment to eternal damnation in a court like setting.
<snip>
You're case is refused for irrelevance. The "judgement" is for an eon...
That is what you stated, so to defend my case.
Your Objection: You are attacking the position of relevance. Before I move on, what is the premise you are trying to compare to. In order for parties to have relevance there has to be a defining element that both those parties are pertaining too.
![[Image: grumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-_GaCN-f8ZFo%2FUNfmimTyf4I%2FAAAAAAAANmk%2FoakT_wL319U%2Fs1600%2Fgrumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg)
I would be a televangelist....but I have too much of a soul.