RE: Humanity's Punishment: If it was a court case.
August 28, 2013 at 11:39 pm
(This post was last modified: August 28, 2013 at 11:47 pm by Creed of Heresy.)
...So, as usual, no explanation given. Just vague statements.
Good debating with you, Catfish. As ever, you are completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand other than to take everyone on a tangent.
Nothing new there.
Also, in regards to a non-sequitur...no, I am quite right in its usage. It is when you state something that is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises. "Case is irrelevant, the judgment is for eons."
That's a non-sequitur. And your refusal to follow up and explain why confirms this. You could always prove me wrong and explain your position, of course, but as it stands, with that mere statement, it is, in fact, a non-sequitur.
Good debating with you, Catfish. As ever, you are completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand other than to take everyone on a tangent.
Nothing new there.
Also, in regards to a non-sequitur...no, I am quite right in its usage. It is when you state something that is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises. "Case is irrelevant, the judgment is for eons."
That's a non-sequitur. And your refusal to follow up and explain why confirms this. You could always prove me wrong and explain your position, of course, but as it stands, with that mere statement, it is, in fact, a non-sequitur.
