(August 28, 2013 at 11:39 pm)Creed of Heresy Wrote: ...So, as usual, no explanation given.
Good debating with you, Catfish. As ever, you are completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand other than to take everyone on a tangent.
Nothing new there.
Also, in regards to a non-sequitur...no, I am quite right in its usage. It is when you state something that is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises. "Case is irrelevant, the judgment is for eons."
That's a non-sequitur. And your refusal to follow up and explain why confirms this. You could always prove me wrong and explain your position, of course, but as it stands, with that mere statement, it is, in fact, a non-sequitur.
What? You jump into a challenge to another person, sling crybaby ad-homs around and expect me to respond to you?
You don't sue Ford Motors for not giving you a lifetime warranty when the papers you signed clearly state 5 years. Filing a suit against anything that is not in the original contract is deemed irrelevant.
Case dismissed.
