RE: Humanity's Punishment: If it was a court case.
August 28, 2013 at 11:58 pm
(This post was last modified: August 29, 2013 at 12:05 am by Creed of Heresy.)
(August 28, 2013 at 11:47 pm)catfish Wrote: What? You jump into a challenge to another person, sling crybaby ad-homs around and expect me to respond to you?
Oh come now, you can't tell me that getting a taste of your own medicine puts you off THAT much, you crybaby.
(August 28, 2013 at 11:47 pm)catfish Wrote: You don't sue Ford Motors for not giving you a lifetime warranty when the papers you signed clearly state 5 years. Filing a suit against anything that is not in the original contract is deemed irrelevant.
Case dismissed.
Good, now we're getting somewhere, though for someone who likes to say "you're gonna realize how wrong you are," you're very quick to claim victory before you allow your point to be tested (good thing you're not a scientist; you'd be laughed out of the entire academic community within your first six months). See the thing is, though, I didn't sign any contract with any deity. I distinctly remember, well, not remembering anything before my experience as a human being began. Now, you could make the argument that someone signed for me by proxy (which is clearly what you're trying so do in your typical disjointed fashion), but the thing is, I also did not ever actually sign any paperwork in my existence that made them as such. A person cannot be a legal proxy prior to me signing them to be one.
To continue your (faulty) analogy, in what court of law would my case be dismissed against Ford Motors if I had never signed a warranty contract, because a proxy that I had never signed any responsibility over to had done so in my stead?
Now, I could just be reading your post wrong. You make things very difficult to follow because your thought processes, as I've said before, are very vague and undefined very constantly. Another point you are possibly trying to make, it seems, is that something about the OP is trying to sue against something that is not in the original contract, as it were.
In which case, what part of the OP is the suit against the lifetime warranty, and which part in the bible is the five-year-warranty equivalent? I ask for clarification purposes.
Also if anyone else grasps what Catty is saying where I am not, please provide clarification if it's at all possible.
