(September 2, 2013 at 8:21 am)Napoléon Wrote:(September 2, 2013 at 12:04 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: It's kind of annoying that he writes an article about modern art but uses the term art.
Is modern art not art then?
Does he get other types of art then? If so why does he say he doesn't get art as a general term. Well if I were to say "I don't get sports" and all I talked about was how football didn't make any sense wouldn't you say I was being too general (or just call me a moron.) Modern art is one type of art, but the author of that article says he doesn't get art. During all of art school was he never exposed to any other type of art? He literally leaves out every other type of art that ever existed in that article.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)