RE: Why does god want to cut off women's hands?
September 5, 2013 at 4:22 pm
(This post was last modified: September 5, 2013 at 4:23 pm by Ryantology.)
(September 4, 2013 at 5:00 pm)John V Wrote: The statute is apparently designed to discourage violence.Apparently.
Quote:Effectiveness as a deterrent is quite relevant.Sure. Let's just hand down death for every transgression. Can't get more effective a deterrent than that, right?
Quote:I'd say loss of a hand is much less serious than loss of ability to reproduce.If you're a B.C. farmer or housewife, the loss of a hand makes almost every task you need to do to subsist is made either vastly more difficult or impossible. You can still work a farm or perform a craft without a penis. Losing a hand would objectively be a far more serious punishment.
Quote:Compromise implies imperfect people. Jesus says straight out that OT divorce law was a compromise.A god restricted by the imperfections of the people he made can not be termed perfect.
Quote: Typical liberal more concerned with the perpetrator than the victim.Yeah, because it is of material benefit to the victim that the perpetrator is given a savage and disproportionate punishment.
Typical theist, justifying atrocities by whatever means necessary.