Ah, I see the issue with this entire post.
SW, you think that since there are scientists that are creationists, that creationism is a science. Non-sequitur notwithstanding, you're just beating a dead horse with this tripe.
Also, I really appreciate your attempt at twisting my words. I never said that science proposes absolute fact, but it does have to make some assumptions based on observations to come up with any theories. Whether or not these theories are complete is up to new evidence we uncover in years to come.
SW, you think that since there are scientists that are creationists, that creationism is a science. Non-sequitur notwithstanding, you're just beating a dead horse with this tripe.
Also, I really appreciate your attempt at twisting my words. I never said that science proposes absolute fact, but it does have to make some assumptions based on observations to come up with any theories. Whether or not these theories are complete is up to new evidence we uncover in years to come.