(September 10, 2013 at 5:24 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: Creationists practicing science are not practicing something called creation science. You made that part up.
Creationists practicing creation science are still practicing science; stop with the false distinctions.
Quote: Hypotheses are proposed, and then they are proven and become theories.
Science does not deal with proof, it uses induction.
Quote: Did your hypothesis that god created the universe ever become a proven theory?
That’s a presupposition, much like “Natural laws have been regular in the past.” Creationists develop hypotheses and test them.
Quote: That's an accomplishment that would warrant the Nobel Prize...and yet this hasn't happened yet. By all means, SW, get cracking on that one.
Something has to win the Nobel Prize to be considered great science? I could have a field day with that silly made up criteria.