(September 11, 2013 at 8:47 am)Faith No More Wrote:(September 10, 2013 at 11:29 pm)Drich Wrote: All lables aside, What is right is right. If you want to have a religious discussion the the subject matter should be Hell in general, not what makes hell, hell for those who live in a specific culture.
That would be like me feigning an instrest in Islam just so I can make fun of the dirty brown people it appeals to.. Now is that a topic only nancy peiosi would be willing to speak against? What is the difference here? The topic feigns an interest in discussing Hell, yet the primary focus has been yellow people who put this video together
And their general level of intelligence.
You guys crossed the line. Not my line but your own, for that I get to call you not only hypocrites but biggots as well..
For me I am a Christian, 1/2 Korean, and I've seen the gates of hell. my opinion, I think the guys are nuts. But I do get it. A lot of what I saw was or rather spoke to the social fears and pains of these people. Something a more open and less reserved culture may look at as foolishness. What is trying to be communicated here is the crippling fear and torment that the hell bound have to look forward to. For them what you see in the video is all apart of a great torment they collectively fear.
That said hell is much much worse than being mutilated by some monster. Hell is what the monsters fear, and for good reason.
I noticed you failed to point out one instance of bigotry on this thread.
Your claims are bullshit, Drich, and I think you're being hyper-sensitive due to your race. The discussion here has been about hell, even though certain Asian cultural aspects were mentioned, such as Buddhist hell. No one here has mocked any race or culture. All that has been pointed out is that this particular version of hell came from Koreans. No one even made that an issue until you came whining in here about racial insensitivity.
Suck it up, and quit being a baby. You're acting like Al Sharpton. No one has made one, single racially insensitive comment, and the only line that has been crossed is that which divides valid criticism with being over-sensitive about racial issues.
What was the title of the thread again?
