I believe the passage about telling the chief priests that your child is incorrigible or a drunkard are just examples, not that your child has to be a drunkard before you can stone him.
At any rate, GC has failed to prove his assertion that there are no passages about killing unruly children. There definitely is nothing about any age limit mentioned in those passages.
So you're saying that parents should stone to death their own children just for being lazy or for getting drunk a lot? Why not just kick them out of the house until they wise up? Interesting that you're actually defending the practice of killing your own offspring if they don't turn out the way you want.
At any rate, GC has failed to prove his assertion that there are no passages about killing unruly children. There definitely is nothing about any age limit mentioned in those passages.
(September 11, 2013 at 4:58 pm)John V Wrote:Quote:it would still be unjust.Why? Who knows a child better than his own parents?
So you're saying that parents should stone to death their own children just for being lazy or for getting drunk a lot? Why not just kick them out of the house until they wise up? Interesting that you're actually defending the practice of killing your own offspring if they don't turn out the way you want.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.