Why homosexual?
There are plenty of people who are apparently not homosexual and yet do not breed. What if everyone were heterosexual and made that choice?
Who do you have in mind to be artificially inseminated? Are you saying that there is a moral obligation on a woman to accept artificial insemination from a gay man if she doesn't already have children of her own? Or, are you saying that even if she does have children of her own she has a moral obligation to accept that artificial insemination?
Why do you assume that everyone breeding is good for the species?
There are many species where only the dominant pairing breed. This does not seem to cause that species too much of a problem.
How does breeding relate to a moral standard?
I cannot see any reason why a person could not live a perfectly moral life and yet choose not to have children.
Wouldn't it be better to look at the morality of breeding and then taking no part in the raising of the children? Or to look at producing children that are doomed to go through life unloved?
I am sorry but I do not regard this as a "tough and sensitive question" as much as I regard it as a moronic question.
There are plenty of people who are apparently not homosexual and yet do not breed. What if everyone were heterosexual and made that choice?
Who do you have in mind to be artificially inseminated? Are you saying that there is a moral obligation on a woman to accept artificial insemination from a gay man if she doesn't already have children of her own? Or, are you saying that even if she does have children of her own she has a moral obligation to accept that artificial insemination?
Why do you assume that everyone breeding is good for the species?
There are many species where only the dominant pairing breed. This does not seem to cause that species too much of a problem.
How does breeding relate to a moral standard?
I cannot see any reason why a person could not live a perfectly moral life and yet choose not to have children.
Wouldn't it be better to look at the morality of breeding and then taking no part in the raising of the children? Or to look at producing children that are doomed to go through life unloved?
I am sorry but I do not regard this as a "tough and sensitive question" as much as I regard it as a moronic question.