I remember in high school reading both books and discussing which dystopia is more likely to be humanity's future.
In retrospect, the false-dilemma is obvious. Huxley focused on the carrot and Orwell on the stick. Why should these visions be incompatible?
In retrospect, the false-dilemma is obvious. Huxley focused on the carrot and Orwell on the stick. Why should these visions be incompatible?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
