Part 3

[Drich]

You would have to discount other possible explanations first, before leaping to the conclusion that it was something to do with a god. Psychosis, mistaken or impaired judgement, hoaxes, dreams etc. Even after surviving all that, you'd have generated one piece of evidence. Lather, rinse, repeat, until you've built up a body of mutually-supporting evidence and we might just be onto something.

Scientific enquiry is a journey, not a destination; unfortunately, all too many salesmen of bullshit want to jump over the steps inbetween.

You just illustrated my point to Max exactly!

Never mind the fact that the God of the Bible who created the universe and all of the natural occouring process contain there in, is not limited from using any naturally occouring or explainable process to complete His will. The Mirical is not in the how something occours it is in the why.

---

Again stimmy as I told RM 'proof' is meaningless if the people examining it don't know what they are looking at.

But that's not your call to make. Here's how it works: you deliver whatever you consider to be proof, or at the very least evidence. We assess your proof and dissect it, then report our findings. If your proof and/or evidence doesn't survive that process, you need to find something stronger that might.

All we are asking for is something, anything, to support the claims you make. If someone came to me for a job as a typist, the first thing I'm going to ask them to do is type something. If they claim they can type twenty million words a minute, it's not for me to say they're lying; but if they can't or won't demonstrate that, they're out the door whether I'm risking losing the world's record typist or not.

That's a little foolish is it not?

That is like you wanting me to help you look for your Dog, but you not telling what he looks like, his name or even giving me a breed. You just want me to present you with Dogs till you say that's him.

Sorry Stimmy, it does not work that way. When ever proof is requested here in the real world parameters are issued to define said proof.