Lmao Leo, totally right.
I get the feeling that our new friend here, FaithVsFact, has a bit of a disingenuous agenda.
Who else uses a name on a forum that mirrors their first agenda?
I also find it rather Ironic that your name is FaithvsFact and yet you obviously subscribe to the former part of your name, implying that the main claims of Christianity are non factual, which is true, yet you seem to have a problem with strong Atheists taking the same position.
Hypocrisy much?
I get the feeling that our new friend here, FaithVsFact, has a bit of a disingenuous agenda.
Who else uses a name on a forum that mirrors their first agenda?
I also find it rather Ironic that your name is FaithvsFact and yet you obviously subscribe to the former part of your name, implying that the main claims of Christianity are non factual, which is true, yet you seem to have a problem with strong Atheists taking the same position.
Hypocrisy much?
.