RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
September 26, 2013 at 11:55 pm
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2013 at 11:58 pm by pineapplebunnybounce.)
proving omniscience requires that a 2nd person is omniscient.
omnipotence: can god make a rock so heavy even god can't move it?
omnibenevolent can't be claimed if there is suffering and god is said to be omnipotent. Unless you redefine benevolence.
Nonphysical: no proof for us physical beings then?
For a believer to claim that god exists then certainly they bear the burden of proof, none of which has been submitted and deemed sufficient to prove any of the omnis.
omnipotence: can god make a rock so heavy even god can't move it?
omnibenevolent can't be claimed if there is suffering and god is said to be omnipotent. Unless you redefine benevolence.
Nonphysical: no proof for us physical beings then?
For a believer to claim that god exists then certainly they bear the burden of proof, none of which has been submitted and deemed sufficient to prove any of the omnis.
