Something I want you to imagine

[Lemonvariable72]

Sigh the bible is the "god claim" and when said claim has contradicting contained with in itself that means that it is not true in it's entirety.
Infact that is the reason using the bible to prove your claim of god is circular. When you do that, you use the claim to prove the claim. So no logic doesn't dictate that the bible can not be used to disprove the claim. Let me explain it like this, say I write a true crime story, and in chapter three I say the killer is white and in chapter 5 I say he is black. Now If I say it is true regardless because it is a true crime that is circular logic, however when discovers that in one chapter I say he is white, and another he is black, then I obviously misrepresenting the truth in either chapter 3 or 5 or both.

Then all you must do is provide a circular claim. And stand behind it. Meaning if you provide a claim and I disprove that it is indeed circular then you must yield and acknowledge the authority of the bible.

In all fainess I do not think you you can do this.
Lets take your favorite A/S/K okay?
I as a agnostic do not believe in god because there is no evidence
You say ask god for evidence that he exists
Inorder to ask him for evidence of his existence he has to exist.
And since no has provided that he exists, there is no reason to think he does, and as stated before good reason to think he does not.

Tell me do you ask fairies for evidence that they exist?

That said if you do so thing as childish as post a link to the skeptics annotated bible, then I too will have the option to post a link to the skeptics an orated bible Answered. And you will have to concede this point.

So if you really want to play this game you better choose your 'circular claim' carefully.

Why is that considered childish? it is the same text as found in any bible translation(roughly). And if you think quoting any particular text help your argument I welcome you to cite sources.