RE: This is How I shutted up an Christian for good.
September 28, 2013 at 5:40 pm
(This post was last modified: September 28, 2013 at 5:44 pm by Simon Moon.)
(September 28, 2013 at 2:20 pm)Big Blue Sky Wrote: fuck it an argument is an argument even if its an poor one it's still better than being quite.And even if it's an stupid argument you didn't write anything back on what can you say to disprove this argumetn.You only seem to know how to bitch about my grammar.
A bad argument is a bad argument and doesn't do anyone any good.
OK, constructive criticism.
And I could care less about your grammar, as long as the argument is understandable.
Quote:Does god know the felling of shooting an hooker then sniffing coke from her tits then rape and kill some innocent people? If so he is evil and he does not exists.
This mess of an argument has the following fallacy:
Non-sequitur: Your conclusion, 'does not exist' does not follow from your premises.
If a god knows how those things feel, then he\she\it could be evil. But a god that has the attribute of being evil still exists.
The syllogism looks like this:
Premise 1: If an omniscient god exists, he would know how it feels to do evil actions
Premise 2; therefore he is evil
Conclusion: Therefore he does not exist
I believe it may also be guilty of the fallacy of Denying the Antecedent, but it's a little hard to decipher and it's not worth the time.
Quote:If he doesn't know that,he is not all knowing and therefor he does not exists.
Your second argument is no better.
Premise 1: If god does not know how it feels to do evil
Premise 2: Then he is not omniscient.
Conclusion: Therefore god does not exist
Again, just because a god does not have the attribute of being omniscient, does not mean he doesn't exist. He\she\it is just lacking that attribute.
Maybe the Christian you shutted up has a decent grasp of logic and didn't want to waste his time dissecting you poor arguments.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
