(September 26, 2013 at 4:08 am)JoeSzymborski27 Wrote: What I'm getting at is a desire for... A new type of thinking.No shit! My kids are 26 and 23. They both tried the 'new type of thinking' on me. Funny thing was, their new type of thinking required me to coddle them beyond the age of 18 (something that I did as long as they were continuing education).
(September 26, 2013 at 4:08 am)JoeSzymborski27 Wrote: You may call it secular humanism, and it may dip into a verity of already existing philosophies. In fact, I'm sure such a rationale is already in existence. But I want to ask you all what you think about such a cause.Jesus tits! Verities of existing philosophies? Rationale already in existence? This entire paragraph of non-essential language, when all you had to ask was, "what do you thing of secular humanism". See how efficient that was?
(September 26, 2013 at 4:08 am)JoeSzymborski27 Wrote: Firstly, have you heard of something closely aligned with my agenda before? What might you label this philosophical suggestion as?I find it a little odd that you start your third paragraph with "Firstly". Also, you have claimed no agenda, yet implore me to comment about it. If you have something to say, say it. Don't vomit random words and expect consideration. The subject-verb-predicate lessons we were to have learned as youths actually have application.
I was going to parse the remainder of your comment; however, it became a bit inane.
