Is it too hard to understand that, if you do not believe in the existence of a god, then.... you do not believe in the existence of a god!?
An atheist is a person who does not believe in the existence of a god.
Hence, even that neutral position is an atheist one.
If you're not even aware of the possibility of the existence of a god, then you do not believe in the existence of a god.
You can then superimpose several degrees of certainty that a person has on either positions. With that, you can construct a scale of belief.
One famous is the Dawkins scale... but there may be others:
An atheist is a person who does not believe in the existence of a god.
Hence, even that neutral position is an atheist one.
If you're not even aware of the possibility of the existence of a god, then you do not believe in the existence of a god.
You can then superimpose several degrees of certainty that a person has on either positions. With that, you can construct a scale of belief.
One famous is the Dawkins scale... but there may be others:
- Strong theist. 100 per cent probability of God. In the words of C.G. Jung: "I do not believe, I know."
- De facto theist. Very high probability but short of 100 per cent. "I don't know for certain, but I strongly believe in God and live my life on the assumption that he is there."
- Leaning towards theism. Higher than 50 per cent but not very high. "I am very uncertain, but I am inclined to believe in God."
- Completely impartial. Exactly 50 per cent. "God's existence and non-existence are exactly equiprobable."
- Leaning towards Agnosticism. Lower than 50 per cent but not very low. "I do not know whether God exists but I'm inclined to be skeptical."
- De facto atheist. Very low probability, but short of zero. "I don't know for certain but I think God is very improbable, and I live my life on the assumption that he is not there."
- Strong atheist. "I know there is no God, with the same conviction as Jung knows there is one."