(January 20, 2010 at 8:39 am)Pippy Wrote: I don't want to post peer-reviewed studies, because they are able to be untrue.LMAO! As opposed to...non-peer reviewed studies??? Are you f*cking serious???
You have to be kidding me...
Either you think that the ravings of some lunatic are sufficient to prove your point, or you've found that all peer reviewed studies disagree with your point and you don't want to back down form your assertion!
Quote:You don't see the flaw in outsourcing you opinion to the experts?Flaw? No. Opinions are opinions. Facts as determined by numerous studies are facts. You present some facts that back up your assertions, and I promise you Pippy, I'll come to your side of the argument. In case you were wondering, "peer-review" doesn't mean some random media company based in New York City that just happens to have a website that agrees with your point of view. We want original studies, with the original conclusions, preferably written by the scientists who did them (the media have a way of putting any kind of "spin" on science...hence why I prefer it direct from the source).
You would rather I post some peer-reviewed journal than discuss things on a more personal level that we can all be involved in?