Pippy,
I think you misunderstand the peer-review process. The fact that peer-review works so well in establishing repeatable consistent findings is that the people doing the reviews will do their best to find flaws in your premises, tests, and findings. Only after the document is vetted, it gets published, where other scientists that weren't included in the peer review process can go over your tests and findings again with a fine tooth comb and repeat your tests to see if their results are the same.
That system produces a lot more solid evidence then any personal experience or gut feeling can ever give you.
I think you misunderstand the peer-review process. The fact that peer-review works so well in establishing repeatable consistent findings is that the people doing the reviews will do their best to find flaws in your premises, tests, and findings. Only after the document is vetted, it gets published, where other scientists that weren't included in the peer review process can go over your tests and findings again with a fine tooth comb and repeat your tests to see if their results are the same.
That system produces a lot more solid evidence then any personal experience or gut feeling can ever give you.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
