(January 21, 2010 at 2:09 pm)rjh4 Wrote: Min, I think you missed my point.
Are you saying that all scholars who think the Bible constitutes an accurate historical record of Jesus have absolutely no basis for their conclusion?
A "yes" answer would not seem too credible as many major universities employ such scholars and I do not think it credible to say that such would be the case if they had no basis for their conclusions.
A "no" answer would seem to refute your previous position.
Either way, I don't think it is as cut and dry as you present it.
I dont know seems pretty cut and dried to me.
It seems that there is nothing that you can point to as proof of a real jesus.
I still happen to think that there was a person the cult was founded around, but that is just supposition and I have no proof.
I think probably a minor charismatic in the Charles Manson, David Koresh Vein.
Anyhoo real Jesus Maybe son of God no.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
