RE: The vast complexity of living things proves that God exists (proof 1)
October 2, 2013 at 10:20 am
(October 2, 2013 at 9:58 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: It does present a problem for atheistic origin science.
In reality according to AOS, both are descendants of a common ancestor, and that both evolved over the same time from that ancestor.
So why is their DNA code sizes so different?
There is one amoeba with a code 200x the size as that for mankind.
Because there's no requirement that the sizes be the same, or be in concordance with the complexity of the organism, and the theory of evolution has never demanded otherwise?
I can understand why you'd think that, it has a certain amount of intuitive logic to it, but it's just not the case; the question isn't "why is this so?" but rather "what advantage does this confer to the amoeba?"
Incidentally, I did what you did not, which is look this up first: maybe this would clear things up a bit? See, before you call something a problem for atheists, you should make sure that is the case, but we already had an answer before you posed the claim so I have to ask: did you bother looking before you posted any of this?
Quote:This topic was to show that there must be an explanation for the complexity of life.
Yes. Yes, there must be an explanation. However, silence from one corner as to what that explanation might be does not make yours correct by default. Think about that.
Quote:Or a fallen and cursed creation as the result of the sin of Adam and Eve.
Why would giraffe necks change because of something Adam and Eve did?
Prove your assertion, don't just make it.
Quote:BTW, since the 18th century, the case against atheistic origin science is now even greater because of the discoveries in DNA, RNA, and the workings of the cell.
Alright, hot shot: how?
Quote:When an atheist proposes God as a rebuttal, the atheist has disproved himself.
Only if you're a deist. But you aren't, are you? You're a christian.
All gods are not your god. And hypotheticals do not mean we believe in god, they just mean we're asking you to account for variables you haven't yet addressed.
Quote:Atheistic origin science has completely failed to explain the universe and life.
So has religion. Science has gotten us further.
Quote:How do you know it will ever be able to?
Even if it doesn't, it'll be further along that religion.
Oh, and, argument from ignorance.
Again.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!