The vast complexity of living things proves that God exists (proof 1)

[Crossless2.0]

Right, so what qualifications in these fields do you have, to disagree with their findings?

Because I'm sure you wouldn't be so blindingly arrogant as to comment on a subject that you aren't educated in, right?

The theories of atheistic origin science are not accepted by all scientists.

Behe, Dembski (who's not actually a scientist) . . . who else? Can you name one who is not considered a joke in the field?

The mistake in the theories of atheistic origin science is to completely ignore the actions of God.

For example, atheistic origin science sees common traits, genes, etc as proof of evolutionary ascent or descent (depending on how you look at it).

But all good designers use common elements in multiple designs. So common traits, etc is just the actions of a great Creator.

OK, so why are there multiple lines of evolutionary descent involving the development of the eye? Why, having apparently got it right in the case of the giant squid, did Yahweh introduce such bad eye design in the case of humans?

BTW, with regard to "origin science," which I suppose in this case means abiogenesis, you do understand -- don't you? -- the difference between hypothesis and theory in a scientific context? If so, please demonstrate. Also, please explain how God-did-it is any kind of explanation at all, rather than an admission of ignorance and a uselessly cumbersome restatement of a question.

How do you conclude that they are mistaken about the origin of DNA, Cells, life etc. when you stated elsewhere:

"And we do not know what is the cause of DNA, RNA, cells, or living organisms."

I think your argument is starting to fall apart at the seams in your own mind - let alone in our opinions.

Hardly. I know what it is the cause - God the Creator.

We meant mankind with only atheistic origin science's assumptions.

I'm not sure you should be allowed to use the word "know." You clearly have no idea what the criteria of knowledge would be.