RE: Science and Religion
October 2, 2013 at 3:22 pm
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2013 at 3:23 pm by Doubting Thomas.)
So you're going to claim that a cell looks designed rather than became that way over millions of years of evolution?
This is why science is at odds with religion. Mainly because religion has already made up its mind with an erroneous conclusion and then fits all evidence to support that conclusion, while science just goes where the evidence takes it. And the evidence has taken science to the place where evolution is not only a rational explanation, it is through repeatable testing the only explanation of how life came to be, not just saying, "this looks designed, therefore Goddidit."
This is why science is at odds with religion. Mainly because religion has already made up its mind with an erroneous conclusion and then fits all evidence to support that conclusion, while science just goes where the evidence takes it. And the evidence has taken science to the place where evolution is not only a rational explanation, it is through repeatable testing the only explanation of how life came to be, not just saying, "this looks designed, therefore Goddidit."
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
