RE: The vast complexity of living things proves that God exists (proof 1)
October 2, 2013 at 4:48 pm
To the OP.
Your entire OP is nothing more than a giant argument from ignorance.
"Well, I can't imagine how it could have arisen naturally, so must have been god".
That thinking has never once worked to explain the universe in the past (disease, storms, earthquakes, famine, etc all attributed to a god in the past, now have natural explanations), chances are very slim that it is the answer now.
Complexity is not evidence of design. We recognize design by comparing it to things that occur naturally.
DNA is NOT a code or a language. It is chemistry.
Your entire OP is nothing more than a giant argument from ignorance.
"Well, I can't imagine how it could have arisen naturally, so must have been god".
That thinking has never once worked to explain the universe in the past (disease, storms, earthquakes, famine, etc all attributed to a god in the past, now have natural explanations), chances are very slim that it is the answer now.
Complexity is not evidence of design. We recognize design by comparing it to things that occur naturally.
DNA is NOT a code or a language. It is chemistry.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
