RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
October 3, 2013 at 7:36 am
(This post was last modified: October 3, 2013 at 7:40 am by Kayenneh.)
(October 3, 2013 at 6:54 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Atheistic origin science
Fail #1. Science has nothing to do with religion (or a lack thereof). The scientific method is precisely the same if you're asatru, Muslim, Christian or Hindu.
Quote:of an origin without God, is totally false and contradictory.
Proof (other than the bible) or GTFO.
Quote:So after over 150 years ... science has not answered anything.
Fail #2. Here you go, a small sample.
Quote:What was the first living thing?
If you by living mean organic, it would be a micelle with some organic organelles.
Quote:How did it then make the jump to RNA and DNA?
RNA is a very special molecule that has enzymatic properties. RNA carries both information and can cause chemical reactions. Hell, it can even copy itself. The DNA molecule is more stable, so it became the information molecule of all carbon based lifeforms.
Quote:Could man have evolved from an apelike creature in just 5 million years?
Yes. And even a better question is: Is it really plausible that humans were just put here 6000 years ago?
When I was young, there was a god with infinite power protecting me. Is there anyone else who felt that way? And was sure about it? but the first time I fell in love, I was thrown down - or maybe I broke free - and I bade farewell to God and became human. Now I don't have God's protection, and I walk on the ground without wings, but I don't regret this hardship. I want to live as a person. -Arina Tanemura
