Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)

[SavedByGraceThruFaith]

Atheistic origin science

Fail #1. Science has nothing to do with religion (or a lack thereof). The scientific method is precisely the same if you're asatru, Muslim, Christian or Hindu.

of an origin without God, is totally false and contradictory.

Proof (other than the bible) or GTFO.

Therefore, a second irrefutable proof of the existence of God Almighty the Creator can be made. Assume indeed that atheistic origin science is correct, and all of the creation can be explained without God by the laws of nature and random chance. As will be shown, this assumed theory will prove to be false. And since the only alternative to a Creator is false, then again the fact that the Creator, God Almighty, exists will have been proven again.

So after over 150 years ... science has not answered anything.

Fail #2. Here you go, a small sample.

What was the first living thing?

If you by living mean organic, it would be a micelle with some organic organelles.

How did it then make the jump to RNA and DNA?

RNA is a very special molecule that has enzymatic properties. RNA carries both information and can cause chemical reactions. Hell, it can even copy itself. The DNA molecule is more stable, so it became the information molecule of all carbon based lifeforms.

Could man have evolved from an apelike creature in just 5 million years?

Yes. And even a better question is: Is it really plausible that humans were just put here 6000 years ago?

An organelle canot reproduce or even survive. It is way too complex to be the first creature.

RNA would not even make a living creature.
How many nucleotides did it have in its RNA code?
How did DNA evolve then?

No real answers then just a dance around.