Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)

[Kayenneh]

An organelle canot reproduce or even survive. It is way too complex to be the first creature.

Think about atoms this way, they are like pieces of Lego that fit together with other pieces in a certain way. They are also slightly charged, so some pieces attract each other, while others stay as far away as possible from each other. Atoms and ions build up molecules, molecules clumped together make bigger systems and so forth. Nothing truly complex about that really. Take an aqueous environment where there are polar molecules that are dissolved, but also non-polar compounds, like lipids. Lipids and water is a no go, so to reach the a low energy state, the lipids clump together, forming a membrane by turning their polar head towards the water and the non-polar tail tucked in. Ta-dah, you just have your first (albeit empty) micelle! The beauty of the membrane is that it forms a certain protection from the outside, so some molecules (trapped by mistake or absorbed through the membrane) were caught inside and circumstances were better on the inside of the micelle than the outside. Introduce self-replicating RNA, mitochondrions, chloroplasts, double membranes and voilá! A micelle starts to look more like a cell than an empty membrane.

RNA would not even make a living creature.

Techically, RNA is the living 'creature'.

How many nucleotides did it have in its RNA code?

Four.

How did DNA evolve then?

By RNA wrapping around itself or other RNA molecules and thus reaching a more stable way of existing.

No real answers then just a dance around.