RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
October 3, 2013 at 12:13 pm
(October 3, 2013 at 9:24 am)max-greece Wrote:(October 3, 2013 at 9:14 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: [hide]
Your answer is almost non existent.
Show calculations - none given. Just that it equaled 100%. That means no answers.
No that means life happened
Code lengths - none given
Why should I - look them up yourself.
Actual codes - none given
You want to write out RNA codes in a post? Fuck off.
RNA - you said yes. But cannot even attempt the DNA code which could not develop by natural selection.
Wrong - it did plainly.
Number of codes in RNA - you said a few. That would mean about 50,000 or more I guess, since a creature would not survive or evolve with less. No mention of the proteins though. Without creation ons the creature dies. And the miraculous RNA code must match the proteins of the creature, the enzymes for reaction.
NO answer given.
It was given previously: "The components of simple viruses such as TMV, which consists of a single RNA molecule and one protein species, undergo self-assembly if they are mixed in solution."
See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21523/
2nd, 3rd 4th creatures ... up to first cell - No answer. If you say a few fro the code length, the sequence is even longer and very impossible.
I did answer - you ignored my answer because you know you are asking for something impossible. I called you disingenuous but that was my mistake as I assumed you understood the word.
Upward evolution with calculations - none
Answered in detail - why are you lying now? Is your case that weak?
Other question on upward not even given.
Could you rephrase this so it makes sense.
Fossile record - ignored questions. LIAR
55 million years - no scientific measurement is ever given without a +- range on error.
Oh gee- you got me 55 million plus or minus 2 million.
That is not even science and indicates someone is hiding the truth. Where you got that number from is deceived.
No answers.
Answered in all the detail it deserved.
No God.
I win.
How did you calculate the +- 2 million?
Show real error analysis and back up the data.
