RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
October 3, 2013 at 12:32 pm
(This post was last modified: October 3, 2013 at 12:34 pm by TheBeardedDude.)
(October 3, 2013 at 12:17 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 3, 2013 at 12:16 pm)Zazzy Wrote: Good! This is a 9th grade level of understanding. Do you have more, or is that it?
And it's not true that the sequence must be exact or the protein will not work. Many neutral mutations exist. There's MUCH more to this discussion than the 9th grade fundamentals (methylation, intron splicing, etc), but this is a good start.
How many different proteins did that 1st living creature have?
What was their sequence?
None, it was a protein-based lifeform.
And it was not conscious or sentient either. The first "life" on Earth would have been largely indistinguishable from a redox reaction. With the minor exception of self-replication.
If the idea that you descended from apes and other animals ruffles your feathers, understand that you are ultimately the descendant of a chemical reaction (specifically a redox reaction).