RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
October 3, 2013 at 2:13 pm
(This post was last modified: October 3, 2013 at 2:16 pm by SavedByGraceThruFaith.)
(October 3, 2013 at 1:05 pm)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote:(October 3, 2013 at 12:10 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: An RNA sequence is needed to make proteins. It must be an exact sequence else the protein will not work.
That's not the point I was talking about at all. RNA have catalytic properties, so the replicable chain doesn't need proteins to replicate, theoretically.
SBG, what is the exact sequence of your dna?
What?
Of course they do.
How would they even be protected during the so called replication?
How are they even read correctly?
I noticed you said theoretically.
What does that mean?
(October 3, 2013 at 12:32 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote:(October 3, 2013 at 12:17 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: How many different proteins did that 1st living creature have?
What was their sequence?
None, it was a protein-based lifeform.
And it was not conscious or sentient either. The first "life" on Earth would have been largely indistinguishable from a redox reaction. With the minor exception of self-replication.
If the idea that you descended from apes and other animals ruffles your feathers, understand that you are ultimately the descendant of a chemical reaction (specifically a redox reaction).
Then how many different proteins were there?
How many of each?
What were the amino acid sequences?
What are the odds that that even formed?
How did it evolve to RNA and DNA?
What are the odds of that?
