RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
October 3, 2013 at 2:57 pm
(October 3, 2013 at 2:56 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote:(October 3, 2013 at 2:13 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: What?
Of course they do.
How would they even be protected during the so called replication?
How are they even read correctly?
I noticed you said theoretically.
What does that mean?
Then how many different proteins were there?
How many of each?
What were the amino acid sequences?
What are the odds that that even formed?
How did it evolve to RNA and DNA?
What are the odds of that?
No proteins until life had advanced to the point of synthesizing proteins, so 0.
"How many of each?"
irrelevant question as there were no proteins because this wasn't protein-based "life"
"What were the amino acid sequences?"
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/201...185848.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/201...134341.htm
Primitive amino acids are still encoded within the genetic sequence of all lifeforms, but each phyla and taxon has built upon it. Meaning you have to get back to the original retroactively.
"What are the odds that that even formed?"
>0
Actually, as life developed on Earth, the odds are 1
"How did it evolve to RNA and DNA?"
Natural selection
"What are the odds of that?"
1 again.
Thank you for proving my point that AOS does not have the answers to the simple questions I posted.