Yes. You see, Tack (you really are not as clever as you think you are) Suetonius was not trying to "prove" that Livy existed. It is an "aside." A piece of otherwise useless information in the text meant only to show that Claudius had contact with the literary brain trust of the Roman Empire.
As I told rj, even a single such reference anywhere in first century literature ( which was not put there by later xtians to make up for what they saw as the embarrassing lack of notice paid to their so-called "god,") would be enough to get me to concede the point that there was a Yeshua bar Yosep doing something in first century Palestine. Can you not see that trying to suggest that Caligula or Livy did not exist either does not at all help your godboy into existence?
As I told rj, even a single such reference anywhere in first century literature ( which was not put there by later xtians to make up for what they saw as the embarrassing lack of notice paid to their so-called "god,") would be enough to get me to concede the point that there was a Yeshua bar Yosep doing something in first century Palestine. Can you not see that trying to suggest that Caligula or Livy did not exist either does not at all help your godboy into existence?
