RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 4, 2013 at 10:43 am
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2013 at 10:45 am by Mister Agenda.)
(October 3, 2013 at 5:39 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote:(October 3, 2013 at 5:33 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: Actually, it would be more like 'I don't see enough proof that you're a movie star. Therefore I don't believe you're a movie star."Who cares what you believe?
What really matters is whether or not movie stars exist. And whether movie stars can log into chatrooms.
Reasonable people say both are unlikely. But at least they are possible.
Since atheism is only about not believing something and that is the concept you seem unable to grasp, belief is both highly relevant to the topic, and something you can't see the relevance of because of the blinders you're wearing.
(October 3, 2013 at 9:49 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: Are you an atheist poe? How old are you?
I'm sure you could think of a classier way of admitting that you've heard all that before, many times, from many different atheists, and that you can't accept it because then your arguments would collapse.